I saw the movie Spotlight,
and I hoped it would win the Oscar for best picture. Mark Ruffalo was just fantastic as a
passionate reporter who believes in the power of the fourth estate and its unique
ability to expose the wrongdoings of seemingly untouchable institutions and
people.
I was a journalist early in my career, either practicing it
or teaching it, and the last part of it was spent in pr working with the press
in one way or another. Printer’s ink
runs in my veins, but sadly today, I subscribe to only one printed newspaper,
one day a week, the Sunday New York Times. Whether you agree with its editorial policy
or not, it still boasts of some of the best writing in the world.
Most of my news these days comes from Twitter where I follow
every news outlet I can think of including the BBC and other international
organizations. As should be everyone’s
practice, I read news blurbs with a healthy dose of skepticism, then go
directly to the longer version for the whole story. Coincidently, I have just
finished reading former Washington Post
publisher Katharine Graham’s autobiography Personal
History, a massive tale of her life that is riveting in its pace and
content. Kate gives a behind-the-scene insider’s view of how the Post management handled the Watergate
affair. I dog-eared this passage to
share as a reminder of just what the fourth estate means to America, especially
now. Have politicians learned anything
from the Nixon scandal? What do you
think?
“As astounding as Watergate was to the country and the
government, it underscored the crucial role of a free, able, and energetic
press. We saw how much power the
government has to reveal what it wants when it wants, to give the people only
the authorized version of events. We
re-learned the lessons of the importance of the right of a newspaper to keep
its sources confidential.
“The credibility of the press stood the test of time against
the credibility of those who spent so much time self-righteously denying their
own wrongdoing and assaulting us by assailing our performance and our
motives. In a speech I made in 1970 –
before the Pentagon Papers and before Watergate – I said: “[T]he cheap
solutions being sought by the administration will, in the long run, turn out to
be very costly.” And indeed they did.”
I was just having this discussion last night with David Limbaugh -- and have had the same with Sharyl Attkisson (not name dropping, they've become friends). As Sharyl writes in her book "Stonewalled" there is no truly in-depth news -- it has become "infotainment." If it's about weather, celebrities, fashion or odd news -- it leads. It's why she left CBS. Once the networks began looking at their news divisions as profit centers (late 70s/early 80s) "news" content became secondary. Interesting take.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Scott...
ReplyDelete